| T.S.
Eliot’s ‘Tradition
and Individual Talent’
is one of the critical essay
in which Eliot has described
with concept of tradition, individual
talent, emotion and poetry as
well as his concept of depersonalized
art. In the opening of the essay,
Eliot’s defines tradition,
which is the literary history.
He says that each and every
nation has it’s individual
genius who create literature.
So many such individual writers
produce a big bulk of writing
which is tradition.
|
|
|
In
other words, tradition
is the matter of past
that is even related
to present because it
is in the process of
formation. Eliot gives
an example of English
literature produced
from the Anglo Saxon
period up to the present
day. It is like a wall
where there are so many
bricks working commonly.
Eliot also says that
when a writer comes
to write at present.
He should be aware of
the tradition. To learn
the tradition he should
have a great labor but
he should not imitate
it. Learning the tradition
is also called historical
sense that is necessary
to the present writer,
because tradition as
the past influences. |
Eliot
even says that the new writer
writing at present becomes the
part of tradition so he has
to learn the tradition but not
imitate it. No writers and writings
have value in isolation, the
writer and his writing would
not be evaluated with the writers
of the past, he should be compared
and contrasted with the tradition,
it is possible to examine his
individual talent. If the new
writer has imitated the tradition,
blindly such slavish imitation
should be discouraged because
it has not individual talent.
Individual talent is the novelty
or newness. If the present writer
has brought something novelty
in his writing, it is called
individual talent such novelty
should be encourage because
it suggests the genius of the
writer.
Eliot
has also given his personal
idea about the depersonalization
of art, which is also called
impersonal poetry. He says that
emotions and feelings are related
to poetry but they should be
expressed indirectly and objectively.
In other words, Eliot says that
emotions of the poet are expressed
in poetry but the poet should
in personify them. His concept
is against the concept of words
being involved in poetry. Instead,
the poet should not be identified
as the direct speaker in poetry
but he should indirectly speak
through the characters or other
objects, which is called objective
correlative. So Eliot says Poetry
is not the turning loose of
emotion but escape from emotion.
It is not the expression of
personality but escape from
it.
In
order to support his concept
of depersonalized art, Eliot
uses and analogy related to
gas chamber. In a gas chamber
during the process of forming
sulpheric acid, sulpherdioxide
and oxygen are needed but they
do not react until a plate of
platinum is kept. When the platinum
is kept there, it causes reaction
between them so that sulpheric
acid is formed. In the acid
platinum does not become present.
This analogy is applied in the
process of poetic creation.
The
poet or his mind is a catalyst
like the platinum to change
others, medium but as if the
platinum is not present in the
acid, the poet also should not
be present in poetry. His role
is very crucial because with
out the poet, poetry is not
possible to create. But, in
the creation he should be totally
dead or absent like the platinum
absent in acid. It is his concept
of impersonal art and he criticizes
many English poets including
Words Worth who have not become
impersonal. He appreciates metaphysical
poets such as John Donne to
be impersonal in poetry.
|