|
The
Four Ages of Poetry
The
essay “The Four Ages of Poetry”
exposes the deficiencies of modern poetry
by positing the theory that in its development
poetry passed through four ages: Age
of Iron, Age of Gold, Age of Silver,
and Age of Brass.
Poetry
to him was originated in the Iron Age.
The golden age is the age of the noblest
poetic productions followed by the artificial
silver age. The Brass age, for him is
the age of poetic decay and decline
and romanticism is the example of such
decadence.
Peacock
attacks on the individual Romantic poets
and by emphasizing that the Lake poets
in general “wrote verses on a
new principle” by remaining ignorant
of history and human nature, by cultivating
the fancy at the expense of memory and
reason.
Peacock’s
attack to poetry is motivated by his
utilitarian view of poetry. To him Romantic
poetry is essentially the most worthless
of all intellectual exercise. Like Plato,
he says that society should promote
those who promote utility poetry thus
to him romantic poetry is a more frivolous
amusement, a more waste of time and
energy, and the supreme of reason over
imagination is asserted.
Plato Plato
is the first major figure in the history
of western philosophy. He is an idealist,
moralist and a rationalist. He locates
reality in what he calls ideas or forms
rather than the world of appearance
that we locate with our senses. Plato
believes in the idea that is form which
itself is formless but it is fixed.
Idea is archetype and always remains
the same. Reality can’t be found
in the world of appearance but in the
ideal world.The world that we perceive
around us is the world of imitation
or shadow of the idea or ideal world.
When a poet imitates this world, his
creation, obviously is twice removed
from reality. Poets do not use their
own rationality; they are inspired by
the divine inspiration, so they are
only forced to use their emotion. Further,
more Plato stressed that the poets possess
the madness and are not in control of
themselves when they write.
Read
More...
Aristotle Aristotle’s
poetics is a reply to Plato’s
Republic. Plato believes in two word
but Aristotle believes in only one word,
therefore he is monoist not a dualist
for him it is nature that contains truth.
He defines art is perfecting the imperfect
nature. For him art is an imitation
with beautification. Art is the imitation
of object beautifying nature. No matter
artist imitate but they make better
world than what it is so artist is not
merely imitator but also creator.Aristotle
avoids the idea that the world of appearance
is merely an ephemeral copy of the changeless
ideas.
Read
More..
Plotinus Plotinus,
neo- platonic philosopher believes in
two worlds, two part of the same world,
one part is helpful to go to another
world. Plotinus challenges Plato’s
theory that art imitates nature and
is thus twice removed from the essence
or reality. He gives a higher position
to art in his system. Plotinus believes
that everything emanates from the one
and strives to return to it. For,
Plotinus the more beautiful the thing
is, the closer it is to the one. The
beauty of the artist’s creation
lies not in any physical object that
it copies but in what the artist imposes
in his materials. Plotinus concentrates
on the idea that artist is the creator.
Nature is in complete and it is artist
who takes raw materials from nature
and imposes form, which is beautiful
and finally reshapes it by offering
newness.
Read More...
Lodovico
Castelvetro Castelvetro
is a good commentator on Aristotle’s
poetics. In his treatment of the unity
of time, his ideas are more rigid than
Aristotle later followed by many neo-
classical critics.Aristotle holds that
the science, the art and history are
not subject of poetry. But poetry resembles
to history since history is divided
in to subject matter and words so is
with poetry. However history and poetry
differ because subject matter of history
is worldly events by the rational will
of god, where as the subject matter
of poetry is imagined by the poet. The
subject matter of both disciplines may
be same but not identical. Read
More...
John
Dryden John
Dryden’s present essay “An
essay on Dramatic Poesy” gives
an explicit account of neo – classical
theory of art in general. He defends
the classical drama standing on the
line of Aristotle saying it is an imitation
of life, and reflects human nature clearly.He
also discusses the three unities, rules
that require a play take place in one
place, during one day, and that it develops
one single action or plot.The essay
is written in the form of dialogue concerned
to four gentlemen: Eugenius, Crites,
Lisideius and Neander. Neander seems
to speak for Dryden himself.Eugenius
takes the side of the modern English
dramatists by criticizing the faults
of the classical playwright, who did
not themselves observe the unity of
place. Read
More...
Oscar
Wilde Oscar
Wilde believes that art does not copy
life and nature rather constitutes its
own world reality independent in to
a new and perfect form. Therefore, art
is not a mere copy of nature rather
it is the creative force of humanity.Wild
claims “Art never expresses anything
but itself”. It does not express
any imitating stuffs from life and nature.
Art has its own substance form and made
of expression.
Read
More...
Emile
Zola Emile
Zola is a French theorist and an advocator
of naturalism; a scientific study of
human nature, behaviour and psychology.
Naturalism is an artistic movement emerged
in the reaction of subjectivism of Romanticism.Naturalism
uses the scientific criteria of observation
and experimentation in writing and criticism.
This theory is influenced by Darwinian
Theory, which observes man as a victim
of nature.
Read More... |